Print Friendly

Over the past five years, the government has applied the usual demand-side remedies in the epic battle against The Great Recession. The graph shows the time profile of past recessions and recoveries as compared to the Great one that we are still in. Though stimulus fiscalcliff1has been applied in heroic proportions, the employment high ground of five years ago has not been revisited.  This graph clearly reveals this recovery lags all others in the post WWII era in which stimulus spending was considerably lower.

At this moment in history, the realization that continuing to run deficits to win the recessionary battle is compromising the ability to win the war of fiscal sustainability — and without that goes future entitlements, at least in real terms. Thus a trade-off of now vs. the future needed to be confronted.

As former Wells Fargo CEO Richard Kovacevich puts it, at the end of the day, the fiscal cliff deliberations continued to put the stimulus on the overstretched Federal Credit Card.  In his words our federal budget is equivalent to a family earning $22,000 per year, but spending $38,000 per year with an existing credit card debt of $143,000.  The next leg of the saga is to raise the debt ceiling so we can continue to max out a higher credit card limit.

What all this did was to reveal in plain sight that our leaders, who are likely a reflection of our population at large, are members of the Now Generation.

Overcoming our current inability to deal with the bigger problem of fiscal sustainability is key to economic growth as well as maximizing future fiscal proceeds and government benefits. To do so requires an inter-temporal trade-off.

This is a classic test of immediate vs. deferred gratification.

This trade-off was memorably tested in the “Marshmallow Experiment”fiscalcliff2 of children aged  4 to 6 by Stanford psychologist Walter Mischel  who found in a follow-up study that children who were capable of deferring gratification eventually went on to earn higher scores on their SATs and achieved other life accomplishments that require some front-end investment.

Now it is important to note that the Stanford Marshmallow Experiment offered higher returns as compared to present returns. That is, the promise of two marshmallows later vs. one today was made by Professor Mischel, not the U.S. fiscal system.

In our case with projected growing entitlements, we just can’t vote them in and expect them to happen.  We need an environment that would be conducive to fiscal discipline so as not to allow unaffordable debt overhead, lest Reinhart and Rogoff effects of slower growth and government default set in. While this might seem Utopian it has happened, even in the U.S.

The Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Balanced Budget Act nearly 30 years ago addressed the issue of defining a framework to self-control government deficits. Basically, the Act created the requirement that adding a dollar of spending would require identifying a specific spending reduction. This caused each dollar of additional spending to be traded against some existing obligation as a yardstick of value.

Well you can image how popular that was, even then, when leaders could pass the marshmallow test!  Regrettably, the automatic self-constraint mechanism was found to be unconstitutional and was replaced by a succession of legislation that watered down the spending and deficit constraints and brought us to our current state of allowing debt to compromise the economic growth engine along with fiscal sustainability.

In today’s societal trade-off, Congress likely has already put us in an environment in which one marshmallow today will only perhaps generate a fraction of a marshmallow tomorrow. That is, growing marshmallows for the future requires deferred gratification today so that today’s debt is not a deterrent to economic growth and future government revenues and marshmallows.

One factor that reinforces the lack of will to bring about deficit and debt control that could lead to additional future marshmallows is the unwritten American ethic to not willingly fork over to the federal government more than 20 percent of annual GDP in all forms of collected taxes.  If individual income tax rates would generate Treasury Revenue that exceed that proportion of total GDP, deductions and exemptions have been added to the tax code to keep the checks written within society’s actual shadow ceiling.

Even during the height of WWII, with an economic boom and confiscatory individual and corporate income tax rates, the government was only able to raise an income share of 20.9 percent of GDP from all tax sources —  even though the federal spending shares of GDP was 43.6 percent in that wartime period.

Since then, only capital gains of the tech era generated a Treasury revenue share of GDP barely in excess of 20 percent of total income. The state of the economy is the primary determinant of the Treasury taxes paid, so a slow-growth economy spells big trouble for the deficit almost irrespective of tax rates being agonized over in Washington.

The rates that Congress does apply are more for political showmanship and a statement of the collective values, wants and needs of its members rather than a reflection of actual revenues received — though I doubt most of them realize it.

In 2011, the Treasury collected only 15.4 percent of total GDP against spending of 24.1 percent, accumulating debt equal to 8.7 percent of the current GDP pie. This will continue for as long as the eye can see or until the deficit can no longer be financed or pawned off on the central bank.

On top of those implicit American inhibitions, the issue of shared sacrifice in the face of imminent danger is also a passé American ethic, as discussed here by Lacy Hunt.  In 2011, the bottom half of the income spectrum contributed but 2.4 percent of individual income taxes receipts, and the recent taxing the “wealthy” adjustment only reduces that proportion.

We can only guess what tomorrow’s marshmallow allotment will be. But with no deferred gratification constraining debt blow-up, no shared sacrifice, and no willingness to give up more than 20 percent of GDP, future gratification will fall on the back of the central bank until inflation inescapably reduces tomorrow’s marshmallows in real terms.

If there is any rationality to it, what Congress and the President seem to be saying is that they realize there is no Professor Mischel to supply two future marshmallows and that the government’s ability to do so is already lost, except via money illusion of the printing press. So, their logic has become, deferred gratification on our watch is senseless.

Investors thus far have been concerned that would be the unintended consequence, but it now appears to be the unspoken plan.  Investors would be wise to protect themselves.


If you enjoy this blog, please forward it to others who may be interested. Sign up to receive the Spellman Report. Bracing financial and economic insight. Now with free delivery!


The Now Generation Government Has Failed the Marshmallow Test: Making Sense of the Fiscal Cliff Outcome — 26 Comments

  1. Well put Lew. One of your best pieces yet.

    I had recently read another newsletter by Merk Funds (I’m sure you can already guess what good ole’ Axel had to say being the perpetual dollar bull that he is…) In which he was arguing that the biggest threat to American fiscal sustainability was actually economic growth, visa vi historical rising rates associated with higher economic growth. However, something smelled afoul… Now I’m no big city cosmopolitan but being a simple man from West Texas I have developed the olfactory senses to pick up on the odoriferous presence of bull sh*t. Clearly you address exactly this, which is what my mind has been grinding on since the Fiscal bluff has hit the headlines. Ceteris Paribus only applies to academic models and gosh that Art Laffer guy was mighty smart -I bet you know exactly what I mean. Anywho enough gibberish from me, just wanted to compliment on this month’s musings. -Andrew

  2. I am now not positive the ploace you’re getting your information, but good topic.
    I needs to spen a while learning more or understanding more.
    Thank you for excellent information I used to be in search of this info for myy mission.

  3. So Now i’m obviously new to the site. We figured out the right way to customize my blog web page but now I need some help learning how to delete the articles that appear to automatically end up being there as examples and create my own..

  4. Hi There! We are looking for some people that are interested in from working their home on a full-time basis. If you want to earn $500 a day, and you don’t mind developing some short opinions up, this is the perfect opportunity for you! Simply click the link here NOW!

  5. You actually ensure it is seem very easy with your presentation but I to discover this topic being really one thing
    which I feel I may in no way understand. It appears to be too complicated and extremely large to me.
    I’m having a look ahead for the next submit, I will attempt to obtain the hang from it!

  6. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same outcome.

  7. Hello are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own. Do you require any html coding expertise to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  8. Next time I read a blog, I hope that it won’t disappoint me as much as this one. After all, Yes, it was my choice to read through, however I actually thought you would have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of crying about something that you could possibly fix if you weren’t too busy looking for attention.

  9. I like what you guys are up too. Such clever work and reporting! Carry on the superb works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my website 🙂

  10. What i don’t understood is in fact how you’re not actually a lot more smartly-liked than you might be right now. You’re very intelligent. You already know therefore considerably relating to this subject, made me in my view imagine it from so many varied angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be interested except it is something to do with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. At all times care for it up!

  11. I blog often and I genuinely thank you for your information. The article has truly peaked my interest. I’m going to bookmark your blog and keep checking for new details about once per week. I opted in for your Feed as well.

  12. I have a limited accounts and an administrator account on Or windows 7. I would like to import all of my Firefox settings from my Limited Account to my Admin Account so they are exactly the same..

  13. I’m really into pictures and might quite like work involving this however i actually do NOT want to consider pictures of individuals (weddings and stuff), i love taking arty/creative pictures. I actually also like writing and I have been thinking of writing for any teenage newspaper and hopefully being able to get photography in there as well. Has anybody got any kind of ideas on what work I could do this involves my kind of photography and writing and how I could make it happen. At the moment Now i am 16..

  14. I am trying to get remote desktop connection heading, for the computers in the same network.. The problem is, my computer (Windows 7) does not seem to sign-up the other computers on the network… May anybody point me in the path that might resolve this issue?. The other computers are 7, if which makes a difference.. The other computers are xp or 7, if that makes a difference..

  15. I got collection of 22000 songs, and i would like to create own internet radio and DJ as well. Do anyone know how to try this in my blog page page(blogspot)?.

  16. I actually is beginning a business throughout the summer exactly where I work with kids independently or during a camp. I used to be wondering the way i could start a website for my customers parents to look at during the summer months..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.